Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Myers v. Illinois Cent. R.R. Co., 10-1279

By FindLaw Staff on December 15, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019
Railroad employee's negligence suit for his work-related injuries

Myers v. Illinois Cent. R.R. Co., 10-1279, concerned an employee's suit against the Illinois Central Railroad Company claiming that his injuries were caused by its negligence.  In affirming the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the Railroad, the court held that, because the nature of the trauma injuries that the employee accumulated required expert testimony establishing specific causation, and because the employee offered none, the district court did not err in granting summary judgment for the Railroad.

As the court wrote: "But here it's clear that the physicians did not use a differential etiology; they knew little to nothing about Myer's medical history or his work.  They did not "rule in" any potential causes or "rule out" any potential causes.  They simply treated Myers and assumed his injuries stemmed from his work.  In other words, the basis for their opinions is properly characterized as a hunch or an informed guess.  And "the courtroom is not the place for scientific guesswork, even of the inspired sort.""

Related Link:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard