Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
In Mason v. Smithkline Beecham Corp., No. 08-2265, the Seventh Circuit faced a suit against the maker of the popular antidepressant Paxil brought by the parents of a 23-year-old who committed suicide two days after she started taking the drug.
The court of appeals, contrary to the ruling below, rejected the drug manufacturer's claim that plaintiffs' claims were preempted under federal law.
In light of the Supreme Court's decision in Wyeth v. Levine, 555 U.S. _, 129 S.Ct. 1187 (2009), the court stated: "Although the Court found that preemption did not exist in Levine, it held that there could be preemption if the manufacture met the stringent standard of proving that there was clear evidence the FDA would have rejected the proposed change in the drug's label."
Based on the extensive showing required by Levine, the court concluded that the defendant failed to meet its burden of demonstrating by clear and convincing evidence that the FDA would have rejected a label change warning about the risk of suicide in young adults.
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.
Sign into your Legal Forms and Services account to manage your estate planning documents.Sign In
Create an account allows to take advantage of these benefits: