Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Decisions on Fees Awards Under Equal Access to Justice Act

By FindLaw Staff on February 18, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a consolidated appeal, US v. Thouvenot, Wade & Moerschen, Inc., No. 09-2421, the  Seventh Circuit addressed the Equal Access to Justice Act which entitles a prevailing party in litigation with the United States to attorneys' fees unless the court finds that the position of the government was substantially justified.

In the first case involving a project site engineer, the court held that based on the evidence, defendant was not entitled to attorneys' fees as the government had a substantial though not winning case, against the defendant. 

In the last two cases  involving social security disability benefits, in deciding whether the agency had a substantial justification for turning down the application, the court reversed denial of fees to the claimant in the first case as the government's position was not substantially justified, and affirmed denial of fees in the second case on the basis that the agency's position had been substantially justified. 

Related Resources:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard