Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Lane, No. 09-1057

By FindLaw Staff on January 12, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Conviction of defendant for conspiracy to distribute crack cocaine and related crimes is affirmed where: 1) district court did not commit plain error in admitting officer testimony regarding firsthand knowledge; 2) there was more than enough evidence for the jury to find defendant guilty of possession with intent to distribute; 3) it was improper for a witness to mention defendant's criminal history, but the district judge exercised proper discretion in not sua sponte declaring a mistrial; and 4) defendant's argument that the district court miscalculated the applicable drug weight and subsequent guidelines offense level is irrelevant as the district court did not use the guidelines to arrive at the sentence but relied on credible testimony and government evidence.  

Read US v. Lane, No. 09-1057

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois

Decided January 12, 2010


Before:  Evan and Sykes, Circuit Judges, and Der-Yeghuayan, District Judge

Opinion by Circuit Judge Evans

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard