Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Borger v. CSX Trans., Inc., No. 08-3685

By FindLaw Staff on July 08, 2009 12:32 PM

In an action by rail workers alleging injuries from exposure to hydrochloric acid fumes, summary judgment for Defendant is affirmed where Defendant rail carrier's failure to perform a ten-point inspection under 49 C.F.R. section 173.31 did not violate that regulation because it did not apply to rail carriers such as Defendant.

Read Borger v. CSX Trans., Inc., No. 08-3685

Appellate Information

Argued: May 1, 2009

Decided and Filed: July 8, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Martin

Counsel

For Appellants:

Martin J. Holmes, Jr., Shindler, Neff, Holmes, Schlageter & Mohler, Toledo, OH

For Appellee:

Dan Himmelfarb, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC

Copied to clipboard