Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Borger v. CSX Trans., Inc., No. 08-3685

By FindLaw Staff on July 08, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action by rail workers alleging injuries from exposure to hydrochloric acid fumes, summary judgment for Defendant is affirmed where Defendant rail carrier's failure to perform a ten-point inspection under 49 C.F.R. section 173.31 did not violate that regulation because it did not apply to rail carriers such as Defendant.

Read Borger v. CSX Trans., Inc., No. 08-3685

Appellate Information

Argued: May 1, 2009

Decided and Filed: July 8, 2009


Opinion by Judge Martin


For Appellants:

Martin J. Holmes, Jr., Shindler, Neff, Holmes, Schlageter & Mohler, Toledo, OH

For Appellee:

Dan Himmelfarb, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard