Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Small claims court may soon prove to be a thorn in the side of corporate counsel everywhere. First, a woman opted out of a class action and was awarded nearly $10,000 in a suit filed against Honda. Now, a California man has earned himself $850 in a lawsuit brought against wireless carrier AT&T.
That man, Matt Spaccarelli, has accused AT&T of throttling -- or slowing down -- the data traffic speed of its top users. Having signed up for an unlimited data plan, he doesn't think his contract gives AT&T the right to punish him for taking advantage of what he pays for.
AT&T disagrees with this analysis and plans to appeal, according to the Associated Press. In court, the company's representative argued that AT&T has the right to modify contracts if a customer's data usage adversely impacts the network.
With approximately 17 million smart phone customers on unlimited data plans, AT&T claims it must find some way to regulate network traffic. Throttling allows the company to minimize network congestion and ensure a more pleasant experience for all.
Though Spaccarelli may inspire a number of those 17 million consumers to file their own AT&T throttling cases, the legality of throttling may soon be a moot point. Verizon already uses a similar "data optimization" system, according to PC World, and T-Mobile will begin to throttle in April.
And AT&T? It announced plans to throttle the top 5% of its users back in July. Counsel must have updated the standard wireless contract by now.
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.
Sign into your Legal Forms and Services account to manage your estate planning documents.Sign In
Create an account allows to take advantage of these benefits: