US v. Hall, No. 09-3165

In US v. Hall, No. 09-3165, the court affirmed Defendant's convictions for robbing a bank and committing the related crimes of brandishing a firearm in relation to a crime of violence and being a felon in possession of a firearm where 1) a denial of the mistrial was harmless error because defendant's 1984 and 1992 bank robberies were admitted into evidence at trial; and 2) even if the district court's error induced defendant to testify, the error was harmless because defendant would undoubtedly have been convicted had he not testified.