Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Massey v. US, No. 09-1665

By FindLaw Staff on September 11, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

District court's denial of pro se defendant's petition for a writ of audita querela is affirmed as his claim is cognizable under 28 U.S.C. section 2255 and there is no gap to fill in the post-conviction remedies. 

Read Massey v. US, No. 09-1665

Appellate Information

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania(D.C. No. 09-mc-000022)
District Judge: Honorable Harvey Bartle, III

Opinion Filed September 11, 2009


Before:  Rendell, Hardiman, and Van Antwerpen, Circuit Judges 
Per Curium Opinion


Counsel for Appellant:  Derrick Massey

Counsel for Appellee: J. Alvin Stout, III. 

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard