Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

McGee v. Martinez, 08-4199

By FindLaw Staff | Last updated on

Dismissal of defendant's habeas petition challenging the IFRP payment schedule and sanctions imposed for noncompliance with payment vacated

McGee v. Martinez, 08-4199, concerned an inmate's petition pro se under 28 U.S.C. section 2241, claiming that his rights were being violated by the "unconstitutional conditions of confinement," by the restriction of his commissary spending and the hindrance this imposed on his ability to pursue his original habeas action.

In vacating the district court's dismissal of the action in concluding that it should have been filed as a civil rights action, the court remanded the matter and held that, because the IFRP payment schedule and the sanctions imposed for noncompliance are part of the execution of defendant's sentence, the claim that they are illegal and invalid falls under the rubric of a section 2241 habeas petition.

Related Link:

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard