Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Cohen v. Viray, No. 08-3860

By FindLaw Staff on October 01, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In Cohen v. Viray, No. 08-3860, an objector's appeal from a settlement of a shareholder derivative suit, the court vacated the approval of the settlement where the district court erred by approving the settlement because the settlement agreement impermissibly released and indemnified the company's former executives against all liability arising under section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

As the court wrote:  "On appeal, intervenor-appellant argues principally that the district court erred by approving the settlement of the shareholders' derivative litigation brought on behalf of DHB Industries, Inc. against a number of its former officers and directors because the settlement agreement impermissibly releases and indemnifies DHB's former Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer against all liability arising under § 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 15 U.S.C. § 7243.1 We agree."

Related Resources

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard