In an interlocutory appeal of the district court's denial of defendants' motion to dismiss premised on the existence of an arbitration agreement, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction where, to properly invoke appellate jurisdiction under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), the movant must either explicitly move to stay litigation and/or compel arbitration pursuant to the FAA, or it must be unmistakably clear from the four corners of the motion that the movant seeks relief provided for in the FAA.
Read Conrad v. Phone Directories Co., No. 07-6276
Appellate Information
Filed November 10, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Ebel
Counsel
For Appellants:
Ronald W. Taylor, David E. Strecker and Jessica C. Ridenour, Venable, LLP, Baltimore, MD
For Appellee:
Scott F. Brockman, Stanley M. Ward, Woodrow K. Glass, Norman, OK
