Contesting an Election
A contested election takes place when the losing candidate in the election demands a recount of votes. An election is most commonly contested when the margin of votes tallied is close enough to be challenged.
Some states have statutory vote recounts when the difference in vote totals is within a certain percentage. In rare cases, an election is contested when one candidate or party is able to substantiate an allegation of election fraud.
Either the candidate contesting the election or his opponent may investigate any component of how the relevant election was handled. That might mean going through ballots one by one or even repeating parts of the election process.
Laws on Contesting Elections Vary By State
Laws regarding contested elections vary by state, but in most cases, they are settled in civil court or by a legislative body. Other differences include:
- Candidates cannot request a recount in Arizona, Connecticut, Florida, New York, South Carolina, or Tennessee.
- In Hawaii and Mississippi, contested elections are settled in court rather than through a vote recount.
- Twenty states and the District of Columbia have provisions for recounts if the difference in vote totals is below a certain threshold, which is usually no more than one percent.
- In three states (Alaska, South Dakota, and Texas), automatic recounts take place only when the number of votes tallied is exactly even on both sides.
In all but eight states, a recount prompted by a contested election is paid for by the candidate or party that demands it. In some cases, that cost is refunded if the candidate is vindicated by the recount.
Federal Contested Elections Act
The U.S. House of Representatives has its own rules about contested elections. According to the Federal Contested Elections Act of 1969, candidates to the House of Representatives may contest general elections by way of a filing with the Clerk of the House. The law dictates that contested House elections must first go to the federal Committee on House Administration.
A report from that committee then goes to the full House, which has options, including dismissing the challenge, calling for a new election, or declaring one candidate the winner.
Contested Elections, Significant Outcomes
Many election challenges take place in low-stakes local elections, such as In Re: the Contested Election of Dennis Hale. But a contested election can have major consequences.
In 2008, incumbent Norm Coleman beat his challenger in the Minnesota U.S. Senate race, Al Franken, by only a few hundred votes, triggering a mandatory recount. Over eight months, votes were recounted, lawsuits filed and tried, and a number of wrongly rejected absentee ballots finally turned the tide in favor of Franken.
But the most significant contested election in recent times was the 2000 presidential election between George W. Bush and Al Gore. An early tally of votes in Florida — which held a crucial 25 electoral votes — showed Bush leading by about 1,700 votes. The margin was slim enough to trigger an automatic recount.
Three weeks later, the Florida secretary of state declared Bush the winner. Gore sued and won in the state supreme court on the grounds that many ballots were illegally uncounted. But Bush prevailed in the U.S. Supreme Court, by the slimmest 5-4 margin.